Enriched Marking: Clear, Complicated, and Complex

Precise, Flexible, and Fun Communication via Play+ | the Process Philosophy of Play

crossposted @ medium

Enriched Marking is a key attribute of Play+. Skinner Rocks, but Pavlov rules. The process of play runs through 2 poles — the Physical (Blue) to the Mental (Green). This dipolar process covers both Skinner and Pavlov within a typical play session. It allows you to fine tune the classical condition as you tune up your operant game. The Physical Pole prehends a situation (grasps it) and the Mental Pole puts together the plan to resolve it.

Play+ Universe and Enriched Marking

The Cynefin Framework’s domains — Clear, Complicated, Complex, and Chaotic — offer a philosophical and epistemological context through which different marking systems can be understood. This mapping is particularly aligned with Play+, presenting a nuanced way to consider marking in a broader landscape.

This is the Play+ Universe. It is a modified Cynefin Framework. Cynefin is a map and perspective of sensemaking that fits well with Play+. The Ideal World on the right is the ordered reality you understand in your head while the Actual World on the left is unordered and actually happening. These worlds need to work together but mistaking one for the other leads to Chaos and frustration.

Terminal Marking: The Clear Domain

Terminal Marking resides within the Clear domain. Here, things are well-defined, and cause-and-effect relationships are straightforward. The marker is issued, ending the behavior and heralding a forthcoming reward. The interpretive scope is minimal, offering little room for nuance or ambiguity. The Simplicity Cliff is real.

A typical Positive Marker terminates the behavior.

Play+ Implications:

  • Physical Pole: This form of marking maps directly onto a Pavlovian model, where stimuli and responses are clearly delineated.
  • Mental Pole: In terms of operant conditioning, terminal marking tends to be rigid and less conducive to creative expansion, aligning primarily with the Physical Pole.

Inceptive Marking: The Complicated Domain

In the Complicated domain, there are multiple possible outcomes that often require expertise to navigate. Inceptive Marking both ends a behavior and initiates a new one within a chain, setting up a succession of “Opportunity | Expectancy | Achievement.” This cyclical process creates a dynamic flow and embodies key moments within the chain, allowing for creative advance.

An Inceptive Marker is just a postive marker followed by the functional reward of continuing the chain. Inceptive Marking discloses transparent work by marking behaviors and criteria within the chain. The cookie for Inceptive Markers for the dog is in having achieved the skill and in taking Initiative.

Play+ Implications:

  • Physical Pole: The concept of repeated prehension starts from the point of success and achievement (satisfaction of process), thereby setting up another cycle of “Opportunity | Expectancy | Achievement.”
  • Mental Pole: Satisfaction comes easily with a well-defined Subjective Aim, facilitated by the Inceptive Mark given mid-chain. This repetitive satisfaction generates an expectancy that becomes the value proposition for the next behavior in the chain.

Expectant Marking: The Complex Domain

Expectant marking is most at home in the Complex domain, where cause and effect become discernible only in hindsight, offering no fixed right answers. This type of marking serves as a “propositional lure” for a myriad of potential actions and outcomes.

Expectant Marking is a Positive Marker followed by a pause of 1–3 seconds. This pause (Aporia per Play+) is like a pause in the conversation or a moment to collect ourselves and get on the same page. This pause builds expectancy for the resolution and satisfaction of the opportunity.

Play+ Implications:

  • Physical Pole: In Expectant Marking, the Physical Pole is activated, placing the dog into a SEEKING state. However, no immediate action or outcome follows, leading to a palpable tension. This tension is the very essence of expectancy, awaiting resolution.
  • Mental Pole: The pause after the Expectant Marker becomes a proposition, inviting a flurry of questions like “Is it going to happen?” or “How is it going to unfold?” This serves as a lure to action, an expectant leap into a domain of creative possibility.

The Heretical Challenge to Orthodoxy

By situating various marking systems within the Cynefin Framework, the Play+ philosophy underlines the limitations of traditional behaviorist methodologies, which tend to operate exclusively within the Clear domain. The multidimensional Play+ approach facilitates a richer, more nuanced framework for understanding marking, in line with the complex and dynamic nature of learning and behavior.

Going to get burned at the stake in a skinner box. Hope it’s livestreamed…

This is research for Play+ | the Process Philosophy of Play project by Ron Watson of Pawsitive Vybe. It is crafted carefully with the assist of chatGPT.

Related Articles

Rec’d on YT | RSA ANIMATE: The Divided Brain

So I’ve been following Iain McGilchrist for a while now and I’m just fascinated by his hemisphere theory. The grabby, highly focused mechanical Lefty; the Emissary, and the more loose focused flow based Right hemisphere has a lot of overlap in the work I’m doing on the Play+ philosophy of play project.

Responses